Skip to main content
Log in

The Neglected “R”: Improving Writing Instruction Through iPad Apps

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study the authors investigated the effects of integrating iPad applications into writing instruction for fifth grade students. By comparing the writing of students taught with paper and pencil methods with that of students utilizing the iPad writing applications, two research questions guided the study: (1) Are there differences in student writing, especially in visualizing, sequencing, or incorporating sensory details, depending on whether they used iPad apps or paper and pencil? (2) What are, if any, the influences of iPad apps on student’s attitude, behavior, or social relations during the writing instruction? The results demonstrated that the students with iPad apps wrote more cohesive, sequential stories using more sensory details than those with paper and pencil. iPad apps also had an impact on motivation to write and changed the classroom dynamics as iPad apps made the writing process more social and engaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boeglin-Quintana, B., & Donovan, L. (2013). Storytime using iPods: using technology to reach all learners. TechTrends, 57(6), 49–56. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0701-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, L. (2011). Traits writing: The gold standards of writing instruction and assessment. Scholastic. Retrieved from teacher.scholastic.com

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2015). English language arts standards, literacy, writing, grade 5. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/5/

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culham, R. (2011). Traits writing. New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: a national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delacruz, S. (2014). Using nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TechTrends, 58(5), 62–69. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0787-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excelsior College Press. (2014). Paper crapers (Version 1.0) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com

  • Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: a meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. J Technol, Learning Assessment, 2(1), 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2008). Effective writing instruction for all students. Renaissance Learning. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1FYLujm

  • Harmon, J. (2011). Research study finds iPad bolsters student reading and writing skills. AASL Hotlinks, 10(7), 1–6.

  • Harris, J. B., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.

  • Landenwich, M. F. (2001). Matching reading models and strategies. The Quarterly, 23(4), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laud, L. (2013). What works in writing instruction. Education Week. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1C2zLMH

  • Launchpad Toys. (2013). Toontastic Jr. pirates: Puppet theater (Version 1.0.8). [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com

  • McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). A breakthrough for Josh: how use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends, 56(4), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L. M., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2007). Repeated interactive read-alouds in preschool and kindergarten. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 742–751.

  • Mobile Education Store. (2013). Story builder (Version 1.8). [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com

  • Moreillon, J. (2009). Collaborative strategies for teaching reading comprehension. Chicago: Amer Library Assn Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Writing. (2006). Writing and school reform. Washington: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notion Inc. (2013). Popplet Lite (Version 2.0) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com

  • Nuance Communications. (2013). Dragon dictation (Version 2.0.28) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M. (1986). Content-based approaches to teaching academic writing. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 617–648. doi:10.2307/3586515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvernail, D. L., & Gritter, A. K. (2007). Maine’s middle school laptop program: Creating better writers. Maine Education Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from http://maine.gov/mlti/resources/Impact_on_Student_Writing_Brief.pdf.

  • Sipe, R.B. (2013). Strategies for writers @2013 foundational research. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1u5ymUS

  • Staton, H. (1984). Think and write: Sequencing, observing, comparing, classifying, imagining, evaluating. Culver City: Good Year Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. M. (2013). The tablet inscribed: Inclusive writing instruction with the iPad. College Teaching, 61(1), 1–2.

  • Tamajii Inc. (2012). Storyboard (Version 1.24) [Mobile application software]. https://itunes.apple.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Ok Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sessions, L., Kang, M.O. & Womack, S. The Neglected “R”: Improving Writing Instruction Through iPad Apps. TechTrends 60, 218–225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0041-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0041-8

Keywords

Navigation